tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5763264385856038915.post4457552865939174308..comments2023-05-14T15:27:46.164+01:00Comments on Plannerisms: What I love about different types of planners Lauriehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03550291806241735598noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5763264385856038915.post-50791413251304555472014-04-14T01:26:34.446+01:002014-04-14T01:26:34.446+01:00I have two ring-bound planners, one letter-size fr...I have two ring-bound planners, one letter-size from Day Runner Business Pro System, the other a classic from Franklin Covey. I have used the Day Runner planner for 30 years. I set up the Franklin Covey to use the Getting Things Done system, but I have never "moved into it." Now I saw a letter size and a classic ring bound planner on Ebay, bid on them, and bought both. So I love ring bound planners but don't know what to do with the ones I have.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12017673834509063518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5763264385856038915.post-56156637815446790782014-02-19T02:12:33.341+00:002014-02-19T02:12:33.341+00:00I KNOW ring bound is best for me. I know it.
Ever...I KNOW ring bound is best for me. I know it.<br /><br />Every now and then, I stray. :/<br /><br />http://giftieetcetera.blogspot.comGiftie Etceterahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11353862141419399333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5763264385856038915.post-35523622419963623502014-02-18T22:30:16.356+00:002014-02-18T22:30:16.356+00:00The ever present dilemma. I love all ring bound b...The ever present dilemma. I love all ring bound but I don't really like bound planners. I like being able to add, subtract and move around.pattygardner.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08465166654988101342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5763264385856038915.post-41811675722735268732014-02-18T22:26:42.528+00:002014-02-18T22:26:42.528+00:00I'm no longer fickle about planners the way I ...I'm no longer fickle about planners the way I used to be, but I can see your point. We want it all, but it's simply not possible -- for example, you can't have both portability and comprehensiveness, as you say. There's also the question of content vs. cover. How many times have we been seduced by a gorgeous binder or cover, ignoring the weird page layout or icky paper because we loved the exterior so much -- until we got it home and tried using that weird layout? Yeah. . . <br /><br />- Tina MiataGrrlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727208043312788510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5763264385856038915.post-86880686767749968772014-02-18T20:12:20.690+00:002014-02-18T20:12:20.690+00:00Ugh isn't that the truth!! I love one because ...Ugh isn't that the truth!! I love one because it's comprehensive, but it's too heavy. I love another because it's so portable, but the pages are too small. And on it goes!Lauriehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03550291806241735598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5763264385856038915.post-81305746600939791122014-02-18T19:56:53.607+00:002014-02-18T19:56:53.607+00:00This must be part of my planner problem--when I se...This must be part of my planner problem--when I see a planner, any planner, I can list all the good points. I don't think of the negatives at all, whether they are actual problems (won't lay flat) or that they are negatives for me (too heavy for me). It's like I am a salesperson "selling" myself the planner and I can never resist the sales pitch.mstraathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15451250623476899317noreply@blogger.com